Why do I read it, if I don’t like it?

Thank you Mr. James for giving me a whole new worry.

Comments
NorahSplogon 18 October 2005 at 15:23

I am an anti-maven (or whatever the opposite of a maven is). I couldn’t tell you the price of something I bought 2 minutes ago. Consequently I am always skint.

Friar Tuckon 18 October 2005 at 23:42

Am envious of your skrimping prowess.

belgianwaffleon 19 October 2005 at 13:07

Very funny, FFE.
Norah, FT, I’m always skint too. But I do have 18 litres of Evian in the kitchen.

And for a bonus point, who is this in the, perhaps a little too large, bouncy chair?

Comments

LondonMom

on 17 October 2005 at 19:55

Hmmmnn….1st one is Michael, 2nd is Daniel? Reserve judgement on the bouncy chair occupant – they both sure do look like Papa Waffle though…!    

NorahSplog

on 17 October 2005 at 20:03

Honestly serious question: How did you decide which twin got which name? And was there ever any danger of you mixing them up? (I don’t mean at first glance – I mean serious head scratching and trying to decide.) 0
Sweetie(s) given    

Minkleberry

on 18 October 2005 at 06:54

scrumptious! 0
Sweetie(s) given    

belgianwaffle

on 18 October 2005 at 12:25

1 out of 3 Diva, my sweetie remains up for grabs..
2 out of 3 LM, and yes, they do look like their Daddy, particularly Daniel.
Norah, they look different to us – I know, they look the same to other people but we’re their parents. Herself, however, can’t tell them apart at all.
Ta Minks. 0
Sweetie(s) given    

NorahSplog

on 18 October 2005 at 14:01

Thank you for explaining. They really are quite alarmingly cute. 0
Sweetie(s) given    

NorahSplog

on 18 October 2005 at 14:03

PS – if LM is right and the 1st photo is of Michael, then the little button in the bouncy chair must also be Michael. 0
Sweetie(s) given    

belgianwaffle

on 19 October 2005 at 13:10

Norah, I think you are owed a sweetie. Bravo. 0
Sweetie(s) given    

]]>

https://www.belgianwaffle.net/2005/10/431/

When I was in the hospital, everyone kept
asking me whether Daniel and Michael were real twins.  And I would say “no, theyÂ’re fraternal”.  And the person would then, always, say “no,
what I mean is was it a natural pregnancy?”.    Everyone here is obsessed by IVF.

Since we have come home the dishwasher, the
washing machine, the microwave and the dryer have been going constantly.  Mr.
Waffle points out that all twins in the
western world must grow up with the hum of labour saving devices in the
background.  Last night, I was saying to him how handy it is that
we are getting up at 4 in the morning anyway so that we can put the
wash we put on at midnight into the tumble drier and have dry baby
clothes for the morning.  He looked at me a bit oddly and then
said drily “Yes, that certainly is a silver lining”.  Well, it IS.

]]>

https://www.belgianwaffle.net/2005/10/430/

There is an annual cartoon exhibition in our
local town hall.  I saw the posters up
yesterday and they remind me that last year, we went to investigate with the
Princess.  I asked the man at the
entrance whether the exhibition was suitable for small children.  I meant was it more aimed at adults or were
there things a little girl might be interested in. They take their comics very
seriously in Belgium. 
ItÂ’s an art form here and hence it was quite likely that the exhibition
might be for grown-ups rather than children. 
The nice man on the desk said “Absolutely, there is no
pornography”.  

Comments

jackdalton

on 16 October 2005 at 22:46

So you went anyway? 😐 0
Sweetie(s) given    

Mikeachim

on 16 October 2005 at 23:45

Having read a few Belgian comics/graphic novels/whatchacallem, yes, they can be, um, a bit….unusually frank in places.
I wouldn’t go as far as to say they’re pornographic.

No, I might edit that remark a little. Here goes:
Yes, lots of them are sheer Filth. But artful Filth.
(That’s better). 0
Sweetie(s) given    

beachhutman

on 17 October 2005 at 11:24

Porn is in the eye of the beholder.
(Well, maybe not the eye) 0
Sweetie(s) given    

belgianwaffle

on 17 October 2005 at 16:33

We aim to please Angel.
JD, humph, no.
Mike, am very impressed by your knowledge of the 9th art.
BHM, quite. 0
Sweetie(s) given    

]]>

https://www.belgianwaffle.net/2005/10/429/